Cases 81 - 90 of 1,138
FoFana v. Polis et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Linda J. FoFana
Defendant:
Jared Polis, Department of Transportation, The, Department of Housing, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Harpe
as 23-5041
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE KING
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN HARPE, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chamberlain v. King
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peter Laurence Chamberlain
Defendant:
Alexis King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. United States District Court
as 5:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Clayton Orville King
Respondent:
United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. King
as 23-5031
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PATRICK KING
King v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene King
Defendant:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delacruz v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 1:2023cv00630
Defendant:
Kroger Co., The, King Soopers, Kroger and others
Plaintiff:
Maribel Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McGoffney v. Rahaman, et al
as 23-1060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELLY MCGOFFNEY, Heir of the Estate of Boyd Neville Higginbotham
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCENT N. RAHAMAN, El Paso District Court Magistrate, in his official capacity, SHERI KING, El Paso County Clerk and CATHERINE A SEAL, El Paso County Public Teller
Manzanares v. City of Aurora Code Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Angie Manzanares
Defendant:
City of Aurora Code Enforcement, Manuel Dangerfield, Joshua King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
