Cases 81 - 90 of 568
Torres-Gonzalez v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2021cv01550
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Petitioner:
Gustavo Torres-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. Torres
as 1:2021cv01448
Defendant:
D. Torres
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pamphille v. The City of Alamogordo et al
as 2:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Janile Smotherman, Hector Balderas, John Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Demone Pamphille
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jhenna Hernandez de la Torre et al v. La Plata County, Colorado et al
as 1:2021cv01422
Plaintiff:
Estate of Saul Hernandez de la Torre and Jhenna Hernandez de la Torre
Defendant:
Archuleta County, Colorado, Patrick Mohney, Robert Bosick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Torres-Martinez v. Garland
as 21-9547
Petitioner:
JOSE RAMON TORRES-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Garcia et al
as 5:2021cv00431
Defendant:
Jose L Torres, Jose L Torres doing business as San Nachos Bar, Antonio Garcia doing business as San Nachos Bar and others
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torres-Gonzales v. Fairbairn
as 1:2021cv01153
Petitioner:
Gustavo Torres-Gonzales
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
