Cases 1 - 10 of 1,276
Jaramillo v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Audra Jaramillo
Defendant:
Richard Lopez and Carlos Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexander et al v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Amanda Alexander and Joseph Remalia
Defendant:
Richard Lopez, Carlos Valenzuela and Larry Reuter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lutz (PS) v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv01689
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lutz
Defendant:
Carla Lopez and Joshua Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Line et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Lopez Lopez
Defendant:
Caribbean Freight Line and Radius Paulny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith-Thomas v. Judges and Court Officials et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Cristyn Jeanette Smith-Thomas
Defendant:
Judges and Court Officials, David A Murphy, Courtney Weaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drum v. Milan Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Amy Drum
Defendant:
Milan Police Department, Tony Mace, Michael Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Michael A Lopez
Respondent:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Lopez v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Barbara Lopez
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
