Cases 1 - 10 of 2,418
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Marquez et al v. Federal Emergency Management
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Spring Victoria Marquez, Diane Lee Martinez, Rico Martinez and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ibarra v. Lee, et al
as 24-5070
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA IBARRA, as the Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jorge Martinez, deceased
Defendant:
CHEYENNE LEE and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ROGERS
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 24-8040
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SETH NORRIS, individually and as warden of Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and others
Martinez (PS) v. Parks et al
as 1:2024cv01513
Plaintiff:
Eugene Martinez
Defendant:
Parks, Fernandez, James Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucero et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Cameron Lucero, Antonio Martinez, Antonio E. Cavasos and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbarker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Porter v. New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Billy Porter
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Department, Southern New Mexico Correctional Facility, Ronald Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
