Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Wofford v. LW Farms LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wofford and Danny L Wofford Jr
Defendant:
LW Farms LLC, Lori Wiggins, Mike Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wiggins v. Gonzales, et al
as 23-2018
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW WIGGINS
Respondent / Appellee:
GONZALES, Deputy Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Wiggins v. Segwick et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Wiggins
Defendant:
FNU Segwick, Ernesto Chavez, Myra Luna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Monsanto Company Inc
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Susan Wiggins and Susan Wiggins (Ind)
Defendant:
Monsanto Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wiggins v. Attorney General State of New Mexico
as 1:2022cv00918
Petitioner:
Matthew Wiggins
Defendant:
Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Donna Wiggins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wiggins v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas et al
as 1:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Reanna Wiggins
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and Health Care Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wiggins v.Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Petitioner:
Matthew Wiggins
Respondent:
FNU Gonzales and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiggins v. LNU et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wiggins
Defendant:
FNU LNU, David Gonzalez, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03273
Plaintiff:
Phillip H. King, III
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, Gloria Wiggins and Rhonda Mundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.