Cases 1 - 10 of 1,108
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, D. C. Cole, Christine Topping and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ryan Russell
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Chris Thomas, Craig E. Boelte and others
Bethea v. City of Tulsa Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Ralph C Bethea
Defendant:
City of Tulsa Oklahoma, The, City of Tulsa Attorney General, The, State of Oklahoma, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Angel v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Kandy Angel
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Daly v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Richard Daly
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. ALI Torabi, D.D.S., P.L.L.C.
as 4:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
C Jeffery Bowen
Defendant:
Ali Torabi, D.D.S., P.L.L.C. doing business as Flawless Smile Dentistry
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Purdy v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Aaron C Purdy
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Enweremadu et al
as 5:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Vickie Renee Austin
Defendant:
Tony C. Aghaji Enweremadu, Globe Transportation Inc, Mominov Bakhtierzhon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
