Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bourque v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00887
Petitioner:
Armand P. Bourque
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID and Oklahoma Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Mason v. The Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 5:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice and TDCJ CID Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teague v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2018cv00635
Petitioner:
Anthony David Teague
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Durie et al v. Ministry Brands, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01265
Defendant:
CID Naples, Ministry Brands, LLC and CID Naples, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Rock, Paper, Scissors, Inc. and Steve Durie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thundathil v. Lynch, et al
as 16-6343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTINA D. THUNDATHIL
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary of Defense, JONI ERNST and others
Gonzales v. State of Colorado, et al
as 16-1226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL JERRY GONZALES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, JOHN HICKENLOOPER, CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN and others
Gonzales v. State of Coloardo et al
as 1:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul Jerry Gonzales
Defendant:
State of Coloardo, John Hickenlooper, Cynthia H. Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UnitedHealthcare of New Mexico v. Alderete et al
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
UnitedHealthcare of New Mexico, Inc
Defendant:
Angel Alderete , Raymond Alderete , Felicia C. Weingartner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Director TDCJ
as 5:2014cv01288
Petitioner:
Irvine P White
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
