Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-3055
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, AKA P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS, a subsidiary of Warner Music Group (WMG)
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-6067
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, AKA P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-5043
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, AKA P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAIMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Petitioner:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 6:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P.Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02085
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 5:2024cv00217
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Combs v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Combs
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dolce et al v. ONE Group Hospitality, Inc., The
as 1:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Dolce, Millette Terrell, Ella Schroeder and others
Defendant:
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc., The doing business as Kona Grill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
