Cases 1 - 10 of 659
Cox v. Armstrong, et al
as 24-4070
Plaintiff:
BARRY LYNN COX
Defendant:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District, ERIC GENTRY, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District, K. JAKE GRAFF, Judge, Municipal Justice Court Traffic Division and Utah State Court Fifth District and others
Rodarte (PS) v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rodarte
Defendant:
Larry Cox, Virgil Ensey, Virgina Cowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ellington v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellington
Defendant:
Spencer J. Cox, J. Stuart Adams and Mike Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salazar-Ruiz v. Cox et al
as 5:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Danny Salazar-Ruiz
Defendant:
Jeff Cox, Ben Butler, Jessica Gieseke and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Alfaro v. City of Payson Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Samantha Alfaro
Defendant:
City of Payson Police Department, FNU Cox, FNU Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
