Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Holyelkface et al v. State of Utah et al
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Avery J Oyale Holyelkface and Stewart Lanza
Defendant:
State of Utah, Cedar City Police Department, Chad Dotson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massa et al v. USA et al
as 2:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
Vincent Massa and Kathryn Massa
Defendant:
Southwest Utah Community Health Center doing business as Family Health Care Cedar City East, USA, Betty Ann Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Haws v. Cedar City Police Department
as 2:2018cv00810
Plaintiff:
Ricky Haws
Defendant:
Cedar City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Webb v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
State of Utah, Alpine City, American Fork City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v. Black et al
as 2:2014mc00880
Plaintiff:
Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates
Defendant:
Arvin Lee Black, II, Sole Group, Atia Black and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Grimsey et al v. Lowen et al
as 2:2013cv00173
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsey and Cedar City Campground
Defendant:
Cal Lowen and Roslyn Lowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Maloch v. Cedar City Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv00846
Plaintiff:
Timothy Michael Maloch
Defendant:
Cedar City Police Department, Iron County Justice Court and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thamer v. Burns et al
as 2:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman Thamer, II
Defendant:
Harlan Burns, Paul Graf, Cedar City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
