Cases 1 - 10 of 42
King v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01421
Defendant:
Kevin Caroll, Michelle Abraham, Erlinda Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Eric King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heckman v. Daniels
as 1:2018cv01864
Respondent:
Charles A. Daniels
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Brent Heckman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Collins, et al v. Daniel, et al
as 1:2017cv00776
Plaintiff:
Darlene Collins , Bail Bond Association of New Mexico , Richard Martinez and others
Defendant:
Charles W. Daniel , Edward L. Chavez , Petra Jimenez Maez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engility v. Daniels et al
as 1:2016cv02473
Plaintiff:
Engility Corporation
Defendant:
Charles Aaron Daniels , Rutherford Chip Surber and Deployable Technology Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Stein v. State of New Mexico, et al
as 16-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STUART L. STEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, BARBARA J. VIGIL, Chief Justice, PETRA JIMENEZ MAES, Justice and others
Stein v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2015cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stuart L. Stein
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Barbara J. Vigil, Petra Jimenez Maes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burgess v. Daniels, et al
as 15-1307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY BURGESS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, PAUL A. KASTNER and PAUL M. LAIRD
Whittington, et al v. Maes, et al
as 15-2122
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN R. WHITTINGTON and WHITTCO, INC., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
PETRA JIMENEZ MAES, EDWARD L. CHAVEZ, CHARLES W. DANIELS and others
Ellis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv01045
Plaintiff:
Damon Ellis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles A Daniels, David K. Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Daniel
as 14-1016
Petitioner - Appellant:
COREY BURGESS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
