Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Woods v. Maldonado
as 1:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Ron D. Woods
Defendant:
Estevan Maldonado and Estevan (I) Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv00305
Defendant:
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
David D. Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hafen v. Didonato et al
as 2:2020cv00736
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Sherry D. Rust, Sherry M. Horne, Jody A. Seagraves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Sanchez v. S&H Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00374
Defendant:
Dennis D Wood, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Woods v. Sheriff Department
as 1:2018cv03236
Plaintiff:
Robert D Woods
Defendant:
Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. United States Attorney's Office et al
as 5:2018cv03236
Defendant:
James A. Brown, Jacquelyn E. Rokusek, Donald Christopher Oakley and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santini et al v. Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jose Santini , Luz N Santini , Marcia Schlissel and others
Defendant:
Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc , Physicians Dispensing RX Inc , Eli Lilly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woods v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Woods
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
