Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Scott v. Dawkins-Huft
as 1:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Matthew Archibald Scott
Defendant:
Teresa Dawkins-Huft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dawkins v. Diggins et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Allen M. Dawkins
Defendant:
Elias Diggins, Lovato, Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blocker et al v. ConocoPhillips Company
as 5:2017cv00248
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company
Plaintiff:
James Blocker , Jamie Blocker , Corey B Bolding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawkins v. Colorado Department of Corrections Inmate Banking
as 1:2015cv02526
Plaintiff:
Allen M. Dawkins
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections Inmate Banking
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayo et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01418
Plaintiff:
Leevella Mayo , Lakeisha Tomlin , Z'Niyla Gallaspy and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC , General Motors Company , Takata Seat Belts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jenkins v. Federal Transfer Center Medical Staff et al
as 5:2014cv01246
Plaintiff:
Ardell L Jenkins
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center Medical Staff, B Dawkins, FNU Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. Evans et al
as 1:2013cv03375
Petitioner:
Allen M. Dawkins
Defendant:
Ricky Evans and Denver County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dawkins v. People of the State of Colorado
as 1:2013cv02588
Petitioner:
Kevin Dawkins
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado Arapahoe County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawkins v. Jones et al
as 6:2012cv00055
Petitioner:
Danny R Dawkins
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dawkins v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv00021
Petitioner:
Danny R Dawkins
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
