Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kramer v. Employment Security Board of Review
as 5:2017cv04001
Plaintiff:
Dru Dion Kramer
Defendant:
Employment Security Board of Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Martin v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07222
Plaintiff:
Dru D. Martin
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moses v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2010cv00489
Plaintiff:
Patsy Dru Moses
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lee et al v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00117
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc, Toyota Motor North America Inc, Toyota Motor Manufacturing Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dru Colin Lee, Dru Colin Lee, Dru Colin Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Riches v. Hooker, et al
as 09-8065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a as Bernard Madoff
Defendant - Appellee:
T. J. HOOKER, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, PROJECT SAFE CHILDHOOD and others
Riches v. Hooker, et al
as 09-8065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, d/b/a as Bernard Madoff
Defendant / Appellee:
T. J. HOOKER, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, PROJECT SAFE CHILDHOOD and others
Riches v. Convicted Child Molesters et al
as 2:2009cv00093
Defendant:
Sex Offender Management Assistance Program, Rape Abuse and Incest National Network, T J Hooker and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches doing business as Bernard Madoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Kully Chaha Native Stone, LLC et al
as 6:2008cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jimmie M. Johnson
Defendant:
Kully Chaha Native Stone, LLC, Dru Waren and Dennis Waren
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
