Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Younger et al v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Younger, Barbara Frantz, Kora L. Liles and others
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz (ID 124145) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Barbara Marie Frantz
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Frantz (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00799
Petitioner:
James E. Frantz
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frantz (ID 124145) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03246
Defendant:
Michelle (lnu), Kansas, State of, Jeff Zmuda and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Marie Frantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Martha Renee. Frantz and Martha Renee Frantz
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Hackborn v. Physician Health Partners et al
as 1:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Dean D. Hackborn
Defendant:
Physician Health Partners, Paula J. Frantz and Cathie Holst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beicht v. Frantz
as 2:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Nicole Beicht
Defendant:
Matthew Frantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 22-3014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, GLORIA GEITHER, CENTURION and others
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 21-3177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, GLORIA GEITHER and CENTURION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
