Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Text My Gov, Inc. v. UpAhead, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Text My Gov, Inc.
Defendant:
UpAhead, LLC and Dakota Pierce
Text My Gov, Inc. v. UpAhead, LLC
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Text My Gov, Inc.
Defendant:
UpAhead, LLC and Dakota Pierce
Antonetti v. FNU Santistefan, et al
as 24-2014
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
DeAtley v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1406
Petitioner:
ALAN DEATLEY, Tribal member, Tribal Sp. Counsel, Tribal Judge
Respondent:
WARDEN FAIRBAIRN, (A.V.C.F.), DIRECTOR WILLIAMS, (CDOC), GOV. POLIS and others
Cuara R. v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, USDA Farm Service Agency, USDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. UDOT Utah Gov et al
as 2:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
UDOT Utah Gov, Highway Reference Online, Public Record Request and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. Kid Kearns Improvement District et al
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Kid Kearns Improvement District, SLC Public Utilities, Lake and Reservoir Journal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonetti v. Santistefan, et al
as 23-2060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Antonetti v. Santistefan, et al
as 23-2009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Fuller v. United States Government et al
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Morgan T Fuller
Respondent:
United States Government and White House Gov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
