Cases 1 - 10 of 633
Clervrain v. Sessions, et al
as 21-3039
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA MELLENDICK, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JEB CHARLES JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Springer v. United States Attorney NOK, et al
as 19-5102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDSEY KENT SPRINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, Sean R. ONeill, Officially, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA, Danny C. Williams, Sr., Officially, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Eric D. Holder, Jr., Officially and others
Mohammad v. United States, et al
as 16-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALID MOHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, COUNTY OF BERNALILLO and others
Chon v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Tae H. Chon
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, George W. Bush, John D. Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. United States Attorney, et al
as 16-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA, Danny C. Williams, Sr., Officially, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Eric D. Holder, Jr., Officially, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, Susan B. Gerson, Officially and others
Zhang v. Lynch
as 15-9538
Petitioner:
ZHAOHUI ZHANG
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Perez v. Lynch
as 15-9537
Petitioner:
SALVADOR PORTILLO PEREZ, AKA Salvador Portillo
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Hernandez-Ceren v. Holder
as 15-9535
Petitioner:
HUGO HERNANDEZ-CEREN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Gutierrez-Orozco v. Holder
as 15-9534
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO GUTIERREZ-OROZCO, AKA Octavio Orozco
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Htun v. Holder
as 15-9533
Petitioner:
KYAW MYAT HTUN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
