Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Melnick v. Johnston, et al
as 22-1150
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUNTER ADAM MELNICK
Defendant / Appellee: KAYLA JOHNSTON, CPO, DEAN GONZALES, SUSAN WHITE and others
Melnick v. Raemisch, et al
as 21-1330
Plaintiff / Appellant: HUNTER ADAM MELNICK
Defendant / Appellee: RICK RAEMISCH, KAYLA JOHNSTON, CPO, DEAN GONZALES and others
Phan v. Wheeler, et al
as 21-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENT VU PHAN
Defendant / Appellee: NINA HAMMON JAHN, American Family Insurance Company's Attorney and JOHN L. WHEELER, Judge
Phan v. Wheeler et al
as 1:2021cv00967
Defendant: Nina Hammon Jahn and John L. Wheeler
Plaintiff: Kent Vu Phan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penry v. Helsing et al
as 1:2019cv03553
Defendant: J. Patterson, N. Kollath, Jahn Clark and others
Plaintiff: Charles Penry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Jahn v. MetLife, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03331
Defendant: Brighthouse Financial, MetLife, Inc. and Metropolitcan Life Insurance Co.
Plaintiff: Robert Jahn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melnick v. Raemisch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00154
Defendant: Karlene (I) Kelsch, Colorado Department of Corrections, Nichole Jimenez and others
Plaintiff: Hunter Adam Melnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1401
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAN BARTON HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Cone v. Medical Imaging Holdings Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00822
Plaintiff: Christopher Cone
Defendant: Medical Imaging Holdings, Inc. , Consensys Imaging Service, Inc. , Galen Partners IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?