Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Monaco v. Watson
as 1:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Leopold Thomas Monaco
Defendant:
Elissa Watson, AirBnb, Inc., AirBnb RPG, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Aurit v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Todd Anthony Aurit
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Aurora Police et al
as 1:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy
Defendant:
Aurora Police, John Bennett, Thomas P. Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Leopold et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07278
Plaintiff:
Leonard Leopold and Leopold Grain, Inc.
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leopold et al. v. Syngenta Corporation, et al.
as 2:2015cv07148
Plaintiff:
Leonard Leopold and Leopold Brothers Partnership
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC et al v. Monaco
as 1:2014cv00275
Petitioner:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Leopold T. Monaco
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Munsey v. Elizabeth C-1 School District & Board Of Education, The et al
as 1:2013cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nancie A. Munsey
Defendant:
Elizabeth C-1 School District & Board Of Education, The, Bart Christensen, Cynthia Gromelski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eagan v. USA
as 2:2010cv02502
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles Leopold George Eagan, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wyles v. Leopold et al
as 1:2008cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allen Wyles
Defendant:
John P. Leopold, Carol A. Chambers, Justin Bogan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
