Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail
as 22-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL HOLT
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC.
Hart v. Foot Locker Corporation
as 2:2021cv01135
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Foot Locker Corporation, Dick Johnson, Rick Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
as 5:2021cv04039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Holt
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elaine K Hall Revocable Trust v. Stratford Holding LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00259
Defendant:
Stratford Holding LLC, Deborah Manneck, Foot Locker Retail Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine K Hall Revocable Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Locker et al v. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc
as 1:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jeff Locker and Rhonda Locker
Defendant:
Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sperry et al v. Fremont County School District No 6 et al
as 2:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sperry and Melissa Sperry
Defendant:
Fremont County School District No 6 , Fremont County School District No 6 Superintendent , Diana Clapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grow Locker, LLC., The v. USA
as 1:2013cv00731
Petitioner:
Grow Locker, LLC., The
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition for John Doe Summons
In The Matter of The Grow Locker, LLC v. USA
as 1:2013cv00226
Petitioner:
In The Matter of The Grow Locker, LLC
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Data Locker Inc. v. Apricorn, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02630
Plaintiff:
Data Locker, Inc.
Defendant:
Apricorn, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Lenovo Holding Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
