Cases 1 - 10 of 705
Chang v. Rout, et al
as 24-1195
Plaintiff:
MENG UOY CHANG
Defendant:
DAVID ROUT, HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC., MURPHY CENTER LLC and others
Ellis Jr. v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Guy Ellis Jr.
Defendant:
Angela Sandoval, John Tekin, Dea Zantow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Schaible, et al
as 24-1156
Plaintiff:
DIANNA CHRISTINE MURPHY
Defendant:
THOMAS SCHAIBLE and SCHAIBLE, RUSSO & COMPANY, C.P.A.'S, L.L.P.
Murphy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY MURPHY
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Donny A Murphy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gottorff (PS) v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2024cv00831
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
State of Colorado, The, Kurt Beckenhauer, Sean Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chang v. Rout et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Meng Uoy Chang
Defendant:
David Rout, Homeward Alliance Inc., Murphy Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Ness (PS) v. Robak et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Robert Van Ness
Defendant:
Alexandra O Robak, Patrick W. Murphy, Lisa Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Eddy
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Wade Murphy
Defendant:
John Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murphy v. Cantex Continuing Care, et al
as 24-2021
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MURPHY, as Personal Representative of the wrongful death estate of Joe A. James
Defendant:
CANTEX CONTINUING CARE NETWORK LLC, CANTEX HEALTH CARE CENTERS III, LLC, MEDCARE MGMT. HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
