Cases 1 - 10 of 671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Herrera- Arellano v. Garland
as 24-9539
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL HERRERA-ARELLANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Vigil et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vigil, Victor Montano, Jr., Isaiah Ulibarri and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, FNU Jacobo and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kalie Jones and Nicholas Stephen Hulse
Defendant:
Judge Douglas Nielsen, Moody John R., Cleave Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Ulibarri
as 24-2080
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MANUEL JONATHAN ULIBARRI, AKA Manuel Ulibarri
Hernandez v. Redd et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alex Hernandez
Defendant:
Brian Redd, Bart Mortensen, Randall Honey and others
Interested Party:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Antion M. Long, Jarred L Phillips, Shamar Singletary and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. New Wave Energy Services Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gomez
Defendant:
New Wave Energy Services Ltd. doing business as New Wave Energy Services Group and Allan Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
