Cases 1 - 10 of 671
Riley et al v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Tyler Riley, Manuel Calvillo, Ryder Timaj Cadena-Powell and others
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, New Mexico Parole Board, C Wilken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Herrera- Arellano v. Garland
as 24-9539
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL HERRERA-ARELLANO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Lopez-Vega v. Garland
as 24-9537
Petitioner:
JOSE MANUEL LOPEZ-VEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vigil et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Vigil, Victor Montano, Jr., Isaiah Ulibarri and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, FNU Jacobo and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larez et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Gary Larez, Brandon Stone, Dewayne Clements and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, GCCF, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Kalie Jones and Nicholas Stephen Hulse
Defendant:
Judge Douglas Nielsen, Moody John R., Cleave Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Ulibarri
as 24-2080
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MANUEL JONATHAN ULIBARRI, AKA Manuel Ulibarri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
