Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Bradley v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Robin Bradley
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Meat Logistics Solutions, Inc. and Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation doing business as Cargill Food Distribution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williamson v. Granados et al
as 6:2023cv01225
Estate Plaintiff:
Bankruptcy Estate of Marsha Dupuy
Defendant:
Amigos Meat Distributors LP, Benedito Granados and Amigos Meat Distributors, LP
Trustee:
Darcy Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cuara R. v. Nestle USA et al
as 2:2023cv00649
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Northrop, Hexcel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wenneman Meat Co., Inc. v. Smith & Loveless, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02353
Plaintiff:
Wenneman Meat Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Smith & Loveless Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Schwartz v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
as 1:2023cv01986
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schwartz
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stenson v. Edmonds, et al
as 23-1020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAN STENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH EDMONDS and CARGILL MEAT LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
