Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Perrin v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv00721
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Perrin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Perrin v. Arapahoe County Government et al
as 1:2015cv01500
Plaintiff:
Randall A. Perrin
Defendant:
Arapahoe County Government, Arapahoe County Detention Facility, Arapahoe County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrin v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07598
Plaintiff:
David V. Perrin
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perrine v. Taos County Housing Authority et al
as 1:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Deborah Perrine
Defendant:
Taos County Housing Authority , Sarah Lopez and Richard Bellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perrin v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv00624
Plaintiff:
Dennis E Perrin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Klein v. Perrin
as 2:2013cv00515
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Colt West Perrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Sorg v. Marcou et al
as 2:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
John Adam Sorg
Defendant:
Joe Marcou, Ricky Marcou, David Marcou and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
G. et al v. United Behavioral Health et al
as 2:2011cv00998
Plaintiff:
Allen G. and Pamela G.
Defendant:
United Behavioral Health and Towers Perrin Retiree Medical Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perrin v. Wager et al
as 1:2011cv02811
Plaintiff:
Randal Perrin
Defendant:
Ron Wager, Rae Timme and Jay Kirby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fanning v. Anderson et al
as 5:2010cv01067
Plaintiff:
Michael R Fanning
Defendant:
Kimberly Anderson, Sharon Hamilton Perrin, Gayle Krien and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
