Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Montufar-Caballero, et al v. Garland
as 24-9542
Petitioner:
LUDIN ROSARIO MONTUFAR-CABALLERO and V.A.M.M.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vietti v. Welsh & McGough, et al
as 24-5032
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEL ROSARIO CHI VIETTI, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of A.R.V., P.F.V. and H.S.V., minor children and MARIA DEL ROSARIO CHICO VIETTI, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of A.R.V., P.F.V. and H.S.V., minor children
Defendant:
WELSH & MCGOUGH, PLLC, an Oklahoma Professional Limited Liability Corporation, CATHERINE Z. WELSH, an individual and JAIME VOGT, LPC, an individual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Rosario v. Delta Air Lines
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Ndeye Rosario
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Rosario v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Loida Rosario
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosario v. AT&T/Bell Labs
as 1:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
Loida Rosario
Defendant:
AT&T/Bell Labs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosario v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2022cv02733
Plaintiff:
Loida Rosario
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Villa-Chavez
as 22-2065
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ROSARIO VILLA-CHAVEZ
Abarca-Quintanilla, et al v. Garland
as 22-9510
Petitioner:
VILMA DEL ROSARIO ABARCA-QUINTANILLA and YULISSA LISBETH ABARCA-ABRACA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
