Cases 1 - 10 of 291
Smith v. Kunzweiler
as 4:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Steve Kunzweiler
Plaintiff:
Ryan K Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pester v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Ryan L Pester
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Price v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00385
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Ryan Walters
Plaintiff:
Joseph Loren Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Price v. The Oklahoma State Department of Education et al
as 5:2024cv00769
Defendant:
Ryan Walters and The Oklahoma State Department of Education
Plaintiff:
Joseph Loren Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ricks v. Hughey et al
as 5:2024cv00739
Defendant:
Justin Dale Stone, Lory Dewey, Michelle Garrison and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha Siong Ricks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaik et al v. Mordy et al
as 6:2024cv00256
Defendant:
Dennis Morris, Carter County Court Clerks Office, Hoyle Holt Allied Services Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Zak Shaik and Baari Ardmore Housing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. Wagoner County Board of Commissioners et al
as 6:2024cv00249
Defendant:
Ryan Russell, Taryn Mumby, Laci Chandler and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shawn Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00210
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Erika J. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Prichard v. Stanek
as 5:2024cv00548
Defendant:
Tyson Stanek
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
