Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rice v. USA
as 2:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Brok Arlin Rice
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Ben Sasse, David Scott, Lisa Murkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Loy Arlan Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Epilepsy Association of Utah et al v. Herbert et al
as 2:2019cv00360
Plaintiff:
Epilepsy Association of Utah, Andrew Talbott, Shalyce Kizerian and others
Defendant:
Joseph K. Miner and Gary R. Herbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AriseBank et al
as 2:2018mc00301
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
AriseBank, Jared Rice and Stanley Ford
Receiver:
Mark W. Rasmussen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
American General Life Insurance v. Rice et al
as 2:2016cv00985
Plaintiff:
American General Life Insurance
Defendant:
James Rice, Thomas Rice , Ann Mecham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice v. Steed et al
as 2:2016cv00868
Plaintiff:
Jay Rice
Defendant:
Randy Steed, Scott Raymes and Steed Construction
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Nunez et al v. Nunez et al
as 1:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ellen Nunez and Christy Marie Rice
Defendant:
Michael Kevin Nunez, Jr. and Raynie Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rice v. Credit Control
as 2:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
Alan Rice
Defendant:
Credit Control
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rice v. Equable Ascent Financial et al
as 2:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Alan Rice
Defendant:
Equable Ascent Financial and Bennett Law
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Myers v. Hansen-Rice Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Myers
Defendant:
Hansen-Rice Inc , Gen Contractors and Rick Radu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
