Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Perez et al v. Teton County Hospital District et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Silvia Ruth Sahino Cano, Silvia Ruth Perez and Silvia Ruth Perez (Rep)
Defendant:
Emergency Medicine of Jackson Hole LLC, Jackson Hole Medical Imaging PC, General Surgery Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3100
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jorgensen (PS) v. 12th Judicial District et al
as 1:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Jesper Hjulmand Joergensen and Jesper Hyulmand Jorgensen
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, 12th Judicial District, 10 Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Segovia v. Farmers Insurance Company Inc.
as 4:2024cv00244
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance Company Inc.
Plaintiff:
Silvia Segovia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Agassounon v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
Silvia Agassounon
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
