Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cox v. Dodd, et al
as 19-1267
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTIN S. GOTTESFELD
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS SCHAEFFER COX
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY DODD and RICHARD NEFF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01406
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co., et al
as 19-6052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERTA ROSE JOSEPHINE JONES
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA) CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN KUEHL, SANDRA ELLIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD DAVID JONES, PHILLIP SCOTT SPRATT, SCOTT PHILLIP SPRATT and others
Cox v. Dodd et al
as 1:2018cv02328
Defendant:
Richard Neff, Terry Dodd, Maria Rensel and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Schaeffer Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 5:2017cv01324
Plaintiff:
Alberta Rose Josephine Jones
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Donald David Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaeffer v. Olson et al
as 1:2015cv00570
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Schaeffer
Defendant:
Kenneth P. Olson and Memory Ten, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Schaeffer's Bacon Acres et al v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02515
Plaintiff:
Schaeffer's Bacon Acres and Doug Schaeffer
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schaeffer v. Syngenta Seeds, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02514
Plaintiff:
Doug Schaeffer
Defendant:
Syngenta Seeds, Inc. and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merlin v. Crawford et al
as 1:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
Brenton Merlin
Defendant:
Logann Crawford, Daniel Bowen and Scott Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaeffer v. Freund
as 2:2013cv02088
Plaintiff:
Forrest Dale Schaeffer
Defendant:
William L. Freund, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
