Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv01250
Petitioner:
Curtis Jones
Respondent:
USA, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Cody T. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Nelson et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02958
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Nelson and Paul T. Nelson Family Trust
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013mc01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent, et al
as 09-3204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a municipal corporation, adjunct and political division of Kansas, CAROL J. BACON, JANE AND JOHN DOES and others
Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services et al
as 5:2009cv03091
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Davis
Defendant:
Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services, Carol J. Bacon, John and Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Kansas State Board, et al
as 09-3005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS STATE BOARD OF INDIGENT DEFENSE SERVICES, a Municipal Corporation, Adjunct and Political Subdivision of Kansas, JOHN AND JANE DOES A-Z, Public Defenders/Administrators, individually and as employees to Kansas State Board of Indigents Defense Services, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Kansas, JESSICA R. KUHEN and others
Davis v. Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services et al
as 5:2008cv03014
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Davis
Defendant:
Kansas State Board of Indigent Defense Services, John/Jane Doe, Jessica R. Kuhen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
