Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Church Mutual Insurance Company SI v. Burning Red LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Church Mutual Insurance Company SI
Defendant:
Burning Red LLC and Teal Creek Life Care Community Inc doing business as Teal Creek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Brakebill v. Teal et al
as 5:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brakebill
Defendant:
Ronald Teal, Richard Tyler, Mike Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teal Drones v. NuEnergy Storage Technologies et al
as 2:2019cv00422
Defendant:
NuEnergy Storage Technologies and Sixpack Technology Co
Plaintiff:
Teal Drones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teal v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
Donell D Teal
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teal et al v. LivaNova Deutschland GmbH et al
as 1:2017cv02781
Plaintiff:
James R. Teal , Melissa Canfield , Nicole Crumb and others
Defendant:
LivaNova Deutschland GmbH and Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00318
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Teal v. Newmont International Services Limited
as 1:2016cv00845
Defendant:
Newmont International Services Limited
Plaintiff:
Lewis Teal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Owners Insurance v. Teal Construction et al
as 2:2015cv00687
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance
Defendant:
Teal Construction, Saiz Construction and SureTec Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Delaware County et al
as 4:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
Donald Phoenix Barker
Defendant:
Delaware County, Suesa Hopper, Jail Administrator Lonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
