Cases 1 - 10 of 11
State of Oklahoma v. Cardona, et al
as 24-6205
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Education and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
State of Kansas, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3097
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
MOMS FOR LIBERTY, STATE OF ALASKA, FEMALE ATHLETES UNITED and others
Amicus Curiae:
FLOYD ABRAMS, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff:
DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE, Inc et al
as 1:2020mc00039
Defendant:
TMTE, Inc, Lucas Thomas Erb, Chase Metals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, State of Texas, State of Florida and others
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE et al
as 2:2020mc00685
Defendant:
TMTE, Lucas Thomas Erb, Luke Asher and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, Dana Nessel, Mississippi Secretary of State and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
South Wind Women's Center, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 20-6045
Defendant / Appellant:
J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, DAVID PRATER, in his official capacity as District Attorney for Oklahoma County, GARY COX, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY A. BURNS, D.O, on behalf of himself and his staff and his patients, COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS INC., on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients and SOUTH WIND WOMEN'S CENTER LLC, on behalf of itself, its physicians and staff, and its patients, DBA Trust Women Oklahoma City
Amicus Curiae:
THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, FIFTY-FOUR MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA SENATE AND OKLAHOMA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, NORTH AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY and others
303 Creative, et al v. Elenis, et al
as 19-1413
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY ARAGON, HEIDI HESS, MIGUEL RENE ELIAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORIE SMITH and 303 CREATIVE LLC, a limited liability company
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Amicus Curiae:
CATO INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
Colorado Outfitters, et al v. Hickenlooper
as 14-1290
Amicus Curiae:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLORADO FARM BUREAU, SPECIALTY SPORTS & SUPPLY, GOODS FOR THE WOODS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor of the State of Colorado
Maloy v. Zynex, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01011
Plaintiff:
Deahona Maloy , State of California, The, State of Connecticut, The and others
Defendant:
Zynex, Inc. and Zynex Medical, Inc
Interested_party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Thurston v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2013cv00070
Petitioner:
Chris Ross Thurston
Respondent:
State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
