Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Barnett v. Sherman et al
as 5:2026cv02539
Plaintiff: Christopher J Barnett
Defendant: Deannia Sherman, BeeBee LNU, Tommy Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taggart v. D'Amico et al
as 2:2026cv00855
Plaintiff: George Christopher Taggart and Chris Taggart
Defendant: Sharon D'Amico, Aimee Griffiths, FNU Durrant and others
Unknown: Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. McFadden
as 26-1358
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL TRACY MCFADDEN
Hanson v Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2026cv00826
Plaintiff: Traci Hanson
Defendant: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Norman v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv00531
Plaintiff: Tracy Norman
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Medina v. Turn Key Health Clinics LLC et al
as 5:2026cv02224
Plaintiff: Dora Alicia Mozqueda Medina
Defendant: Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Desiree Nitzel, LPN Jewel Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens v. Oklahoma Attorney General Office, et al
as 26-5113
Petitioner: LINH TRAN STEPHENS
Defendant: OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE, (OAG), STATE OF OKLAHOMA, OKLAHOMA STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, (OSBI) and others
In re: Morgan
as 26-1325
Petitioner: TRACY MORGAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
English v. Hill et al
as 1:2026cv00135
Plaintiff: James Walter English
Defendant: Jonanthan David Hill, Brayden Moore, Andrew Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baca (PS) v. Colman
as 1:2026cv03742
Petitioner: Pedro Baca
Respondent: Tracy Colman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?