Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wilhite v. LNU
as 1:2019cv00567
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Joshua Scott Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanliner Insurance Company v. Angelo et al
as 1:2017cv01467
Plaintiff:
Vanliner Insurance Company
Defendant:
Michael Angelo, Internal Revenue Service , Colorado Division of Human Services, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Loftis v. Eades, et al
as 16-7009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMBRY JAY LOFTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY EADES and GAIL WILHITE
Bloom et al v. ABC Collections, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01329
Defendant:
ABC Collections, Inc., Healthcare Collections, Ltd. Liability Co. d/b/a The Advantage Group, Marrick Medical Finance, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bloom and Sawaya, Rose, McClure & Wilhite, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Bloom et al v. ABC Collections, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01332
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bloom and Sawaya, Rose, McClure & Wilhite, P.C.
Defendant:
ABC Collections, Inc., Marrick Medical Finance, LLC, Delta County Memorial Hospital District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Loftis v. Eades et al
as 6:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Embry Jay Loftis
Defendant:
Billy Eades and Gail Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilhite v. Pfizer Inc.
as 1:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Wilhite
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilhite v. Consumer Law Associates, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv04013
Defendant:
Consumer Law Associates, LLC , Neil J. Ruther and EFA Processing, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Taylor L. Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilhite v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Wilhite
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
