Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fucci, et al v. First American Title Insurance Company, et al
as 24-4051
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. FUCCI, an individual, AMBLESIDE PARK, a New Hampshire corporation, RICHARD HARDER, trustee of the Richard and Susan Harder Living Trust and others
Defendant:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska Corporation, KIRSTEN PARKIN, an individual, WILLIAM BOWSER, an individual and others
Fucci et al v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Samson, Maxon-Multiline, EC9 Holdings and others
Defendant:
J&J Cubit Construction, Christopher J. Ashby, Kate Jensen and others
Partridge et al v. Equifax et al
as 2:2017cv01017
Plaintiff:
Tom Partridge , Zane L. Christensen , Jennifer J. Christensen and others
Defendant:
Equifax and Equifax Information Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. USA
as 6:2017cv00227
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Earl Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wright v. USA
as 6:2017cv00224
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Henry Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wright v. Pelle et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Petitioner:
William LeRoy Wright
Respondent:
Joe Pelle and Boulder County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. USA
as 6:2016cv00258
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Earl Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dietz v. Cypress Semiconductor
as 16-1209
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TIMOTHY C. DIETZ
Defendant - Appellant:
CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
Interested Party:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, ASSOCIATE REGIONAL SOLICITOR, REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR and others
Wright v. Hodge, et al
as 1:2012cv02214
Plaintiff:
William L. Wright
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Travis Trani, Anthony A. DeCesaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Strum et al
as 1:2008cv00666
Plaintiff:
William M. Wright
Defendant:
Michelle Strum and Efrain Ubinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
