Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Zuber v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv01420
Plaintiff:
Donna Zuber
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Amburn et al v. Abbot Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00885
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Deane, Robert L Drydren, Barbara L. Letzig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zuber v. Foley et al
as 1:2018cv00345
Plaintiff:
Neil Zuber
Defendant:
Mynette Foley and Western Valley Family Practice P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Denver Adult Probation et al
as 1:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Davon Q. Williams
Defendant:
Denver Adult Probation, Cathy Carrigan and Wesley Zuber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Zuber
as 14-3116
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHERI L. ZUBER
Zuber v. USA
as 2:2013cv02306
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sheri L. Zuber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martin et al v. Carrigan et al
as 1:2012cv02785
Plaintiff:
Ralph Vincent Martin and Margaret A. Martin
Defendant:
Cathy Carrigan, Wesley Zuber, Scott Prendergast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Cathy et al
as 1:2012cv02784
Plaintiff:
Ralph Vincent Martin and Margaret A Martin
Defendant:
Carrigan Cathy, Wesley Zuber, Scott Prendergast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Zuber
as 11-3179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHERI L. ZUBER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
