Cases 31 - 40 of 1,612
Robinson v. Brice
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tonya Robinson
Defendant:
Jay S. Brice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Tyler Collins
Defendant:
Larry Hatfield and Matt Spradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin v. Lowndes County Sheriff Office et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
James Martin
Defendant:
Lowndes County Sheriff Office and Christopher West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Ivey
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
American Alliance for Equal Rights
Defendant:
Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farmer & Associates, Inc. v. The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
. Farmer & Associates, Inc. and Farmer & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville, a public corporation, Shelby James Posey and The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts et al v. City of Wetumpka et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Beverly Roberts and Mary Alston
Defendant:
City of Wetumpka, Jerry Willis, Greg Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wadsworth v. QCHC, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Megan Wadsworth
Defendant:
QCHC, Inc. and Meagan Elise Fenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
