Cases 1 - 10 of 1,609
Binion v. City of Clanton et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Binion
Defendant:
City of Clanton, City Council Clanton and Jeff Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. City of Clanton Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Turner
Defendant:
City of Clanton Alabama, Chilton County, Alabama, Austin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Dynamic Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc.
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Wes Allen
Defendant:
Saul Douglas Smith and The Principal Campaign Committee of Saul Douglas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Reaves et al v. City of Auburn et al
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Bianca Reaves and Kathy R. Williams
Defendant:
City of Auburn, City of Auburn Police Department, Cedric Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Reece et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece and Sheriff Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Google LLC (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Google LLC doing business as Youtube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glenn v. ATR Auto Transport & Recovery (MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Qiana Glenn
Defendant:
ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
