Cases 51 - 60 of 4,236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Dynamic Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wendy's Inc.
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farmer & Associates, Inc. v. The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
. Farmer & Associates, Inc. and Farmer & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville, a public corporation, Shelby James Posey and The Utilities Board of the Town of Maplesville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roberts et al v. City of Wetumpka et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Beverly Roberts and Mary Alston
Defendant:
City of Wetumpka, Jerry Willis, Greg Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wadsworth v. QCHC, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Megan Wadsworth
Defendant:
QCHC, Inc. and Meagan Elise Fenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Ivey (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burton v. English et al(MAG+)
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Burton
Defendant:
Bill English and Scott Cone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
