Cases 1 - 10 of 4,240
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turner v. City of Clanton Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Turner
Defendant:
City of Clanton Alabama, Chilton County, Alabama, Austin Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Wes Allen
Defendant:
Saul Douglas Smith and The Principal Campaign Committee of Saul Douglas Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, Alabama DHR, Barbour DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Reece et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece and Sheriff Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Google LLC (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Google LLC doing business as Youtube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
