Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Kachmar, et al. v. Department of Veterans Affairs Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System
as 2:2014cv01038
Plaintiff:
Kala Kachmar and The Advertiser Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Coltharp v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Lori Coltharp
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Garland et al
as 2:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sandra Garland , Marianna Radiology, Southern Bone & Joint Specialist and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Michelle Parkin
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sandra Garland
Counter_claimant:
Sandra Garland
Counter_defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Lewis v. Randle et al
as 2:2009cv00809
Plaintiff:
Bennie Frank Lewis
Defendant:
Ricardo Randle, A. L. Hill and Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Womack et al v. United States of America (MAG+)(LEAD)
as 2:2008cv00534
Plaintiff:
Vernesia Lee Womack
Defendant:
United States of America
Consol Plaintiff:
Ganesia L. Womack
Consol Defendant:
United States Government Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Womack v. United States Government Department of Veteran Affairs (MEMBER)
as 2:2008cv00664
Plaintiff:
Ganesia L. Womack
Defendant:
United States Government Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Department of Veterans Affairs (MAG+)
as 3:2007cv00490
Plaintiff:
Fred Douglas Holmes
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
