Cases 21 - 30 of 276
Dennis Christensen v. Reddish, et al
as 22-13485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS CHRISTENSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
REDDISH, STARLING, C. UNDERHILL and others
Joseph Lewis v. D. Canady, et al
as 22-13156
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH MANUEL LEWIS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. CANADY, Captain, B. LOPEZ, Lieutenant and K. BOUZA, Director
Darrell Butler v. Warden, et al
as 22-11372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL WAYNE BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, M. CORRALES, Assistant Warden, D. GREEN, Major of Security and others
Jackie Berger v. John Godwin, et al
as 22-11305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACKIE BERGER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GODWIN, Asst. Warden, B. ALLEN, Asst. Warden, G.H. WALDRON, Colonel and others
Calvin James v. Coleman USP 1
as 22-11304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
COLEMAN USP 1, Psychology Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Lola v. Monroe County Sheriff, et al
as 22-10810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES LOLA
Defendant / Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF, Rick Ramsey, individually and as Monroe County Sheriff, ARAMARK, INC., a corporation of unknown origin, ANNE SWEENEY, individually and as Sheriff's Officer and others
Michael Haspel v. Nellie Lawson, et al
as 22-10608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HASPEL
Defendant / Appellee:
NELLIE LAWSON, I. THOMAS, B. LAMASTERS and others
Sandro Dentone v. United States Attorney General, et al
as 18-13359
Petitioner - Appellant:
SANDRO RAPHAEL PUELLES DENTONE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Jefferson B. Sessions and WARDEN, FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER MIAMI
Recondall Wiggins v. South Bay CF Warden, et al
as 18-13212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RECONDALL L. WIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH BAY CF WARDEN, ALBERT, South Bay Correctional Facility, In his official capacity and ABNER, Seargent, B-Dorm, South Bay Correctional Faciliy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
