Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 101 - 110 of 3,312
USA v. Tyquan Williams
as 23-13799
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: TYQUAN WILLIAMS
Son Vuong v. William Hall, Jr., et al
as 23-13737
Plaintiff / Appellant: SON THI VUONG
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM DEAN HALL, JR., JOSHUA C. CANTON, TERRY P. LEWIS and others
Saleem Williams v. Hancock SP Warden
as 23-13787
Petitioner / Appellant: SALEEM D. WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee: HANCOCK SP WARDEN
Thomas Williams v. Harris Sanitation, Inc.
as 23-13679
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS M. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee: HARRIS SANITATION, INC.
William Jackson v. Doris Jackson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-13705
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee: DORIS CHAPPELL JACKSON
Kevin Williams v. USA
as 23-13641
Petitioner / Appellant: KEVIN WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Johnathan Williams, et al v. 3rd Home Limited, et al
as 23-13593
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOHNATHAN WILLIAMS and ANTHONY ARONA
Defendant / Appellee: 3RD HOME LIMITED, WADE SHEALY and 3RD HOME LIMITED CO.
Richard Belits, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13581
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD BELITS, EVON FOISTER, PEGGY FORD and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Donald O. Williams v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 23-13565
Petitioner / Appellant: DONALD O. WILLIAMS
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Richard Bard, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13540
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID KLINE
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD W. BARD, RODERICK BATES, JR., ELENA BAZILIAN and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?