Cases 11 - 20 of 694
Mt. Hawley Insurance Company v. H&M Builders, LLC, et al
as 24-10460
Plaintiff:
MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
H&M BUILDERS, LLC and GLORIA ESCALANTE
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, et al
as 24-10478
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA and COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, FL
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Anthony Burnett v. Purnell Davis, et al
as 24-10221
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BURNETT
Respondent:
CONNIE H. CHEATHAM, PURNELL E. DAVIS, TYRONE OLIVER and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida
as 24-10537
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA
USA v. Adam Smith
as 24-10044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM H. SMITH
Jermaine Harmon v. Anthony Rhodes, et al
as 23-13805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE ALFONSO HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY W. RHODES, CODY BENSLAY, ERIC HENKEL and others
Philip Krause v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-13283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILIP KRAUSE, VALENCIA GARRETT, ANA MONDRAGON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, APOTEX CORP., MICHAEL MCCANDLESS and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT and COMMON CAUSE
Not Classified By Court:
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE
Christopher Baylor v. The Florida Klu Klux Klan for the Traditionalist A, et al
as 23-13250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
THE FLORIDA KLU KLUX KLAN FOR THE TRADITIONALIST AMERICANS, CHARLES T. CANADY, RICKY POLSTON and others
Eric Youngblood, Sr., et al v. City of Georgiana, Alabama, et al
as 23-13142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC C. YOUNGBLOOD, SR. and MELISSA D. YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF GEORGIANA, ALABAMA, WILLIE R. BENBOW, BEVERLY H. ROGERS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
