Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Angela McCullough, et al v. City of Montgomery, Alabama, et al
as 17-11554
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANGELA MCCULLOUGH, MARQUITA JOHNSON, KENNY JONES and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, ERNEST FINLEY, KEVIN MURPHY, former Chief of Police of the City of Montgomery, in his individual and official capacities and others
Jabbarri Ash v. Theodore Jackson, et al
as 16-10329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JABBARRI KEYON ASH
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE JACKSON, MARK ADGERS, RUEBEN WINGFIELD and others
Public Employees for Environme, et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of, et al
as 15-11599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY, SIERRA CLUB, SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLANDS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, JONATHAN B. JARVIS, Director, National Park Service and DANIEL M. ASHE, Director, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Richard Ashe v. Karla Jones, et al
as 14-15410
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD CHRISTOPHER ASHE
Respondent - Appellee:
KARLA JONES and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Elisha Gilbert, Jr. v. Barbara Kaufman, et al
as 14-14032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELISHA GILBERT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA BABBIT KAUFMAN, Vice Chairman, Fulton County, HAROLD BUCKLEY, SR., Treasurer, DeKalb County, JUANITA JONES ABERNATHY, Secretary, City of Atlanta and others
:
SERVICE and BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, FULTON COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-12130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Ashe v. City of Montgomery, et al
as 11-10089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ASHE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY and TONY'S AUTOMOTIVE
Ash-Shakur Shabazz v. Tony Patterson, et al
as 10-12558
Petitioner - Appellant:
ASH-SHAKUR SHABAZZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALABAMA and GRANTT CULLIVER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
