Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Tavares Farrington v. USP Atlanta Warden, et al
as 22-13301
Plaintiff / Appellant: TAVARES LENARD FARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee: USP ATLANTA WARDEN, MORENO, HARDIN and others
Thomas Murphy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12923
Petitioner / Appellant: THOMAS MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Catherine Taylor v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
as 22-12870
Plaintiff / Appellant: CATHERINE TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee: MURPHY OIL USA, INC.
USA v. Joseph Murphy
as 22-12381
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JOSEPH LEE MURPHY
Danny Murphy v. USA
as 22-11688
Petitioner / Appellant: DANNY RAY MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Colleen Murphy v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al
as 22-11485
Defendant / Appellant: COLLEEN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee: VOLKSWAGON GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and AUDI OF AMERICA, LLC
James Pentz, et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al
as 22-11483
Defendant / Appellant: JOHN JACOB PENTZ, III, ALEXANDER MIRON and COLLEEN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee: VOLKSWAGON GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and AUDI OF AMERICA, LLC
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Interested Party: JAMES E. PENTZ
Debra Curry v. Clayton County Police Department, et al
as 22-11202
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEBRA DENISE CURRY
Defendant / Appellee: CLAYTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, TERRY BASKIN, CLAYTON TAX COMMISSIONERS OFFICE and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant: WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee: TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Jonathan Hall v. Jason Smoak, et al
as 22-10345
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN HALL
Defendant / Appellee: JASON SMOAK, JAMES BRAZIER, MARK TRAWICK, Sgt. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?