Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,619
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10473
Plaintiff: DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant: TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. FCC Forrest City Warden, et al
as 24-10452
Plaintiff: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant: FCC FORREST CITY WARDEN, BLAIR, RANDLE and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, et al
as 24-10254
Plaintiff: MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant: JOHN T FOWLKES, DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Dionte Davis v. Tiffani Knox, et al
as 24-10203
Plaintiff: DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS
Defendant: TIFFANI S. KNOX, C. RUSSELL, TYLER WATSON and others
Richard Skipper v. USA
as 24-10165
Plaintiff: RICHARD C. SKIPPER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dale Newton v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-10166
Petitioner / Appellant: DALE C. NEWTON
Defendant / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
William Wilborn v. Gwinnett County Detention Center, et al
as 24-10064
Plaintiff: WILLIAM R. WILBORN
Defendant: GWINNETT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, JOHN DOE, Supervisor of North Hall Units, official capacity, C. GORDAN, Individual and A-Unit Officer, official capacity and others
Joan Davis v. The Office of Bar Admissions, et al
as 23-14236
Plaintiff: JOAN P. DAVIS
Defendant: DAVID ERICH NAHMIAS, of the Georgia Supreme Court, in his individual capacity, HEIDI M. FAENZA, Director of Admissions of the Office of Bar Admissions, in her individual capacity and JOHN C. SAMMON, Chairman of the Board to Determine Fitness of Bar Applicants, in his individual capacity
Joseph Bozicevich v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14016
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH C. BOZICEVICH
Respondent / Appellee: FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Herman Morris, Jr. v. William Rumer
as 23-13997
Petitioner / Appellant: HERMAN MORRIS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM C. RUMER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?