Cases 21 - 30 of 1,082
James Edwards v. USA
as 24-10501
Petitioner:
JAMES JOHN EDWARDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Orthogen International GmbH v. Edward Capla, et al
as 24-10411
Plaintiff:
ORTHOGEN INTERNATIONAL GMBH, for an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to conduct discovery for use in a foreign proceeding
Defendant:
EDWARD CAPLA and YOLANDA CAPLA
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Intervenor:
DOUGLAS SCHOTTENSTEIN and SCHOTTENSTEIN PAIN AND NEURO, PLLC D/B/A NY SPINE
Robert FiedlerIn re: Robert Fiedler
as 24-10273
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT EDWARD FIEDLER
Respondent:
MICHAEL RUDISILL, NANCY E. BRANDT, GINGER B. BOYD and others
Boca View Condominium Association, Inc. v. Eleanor Lepselter, et al
as 24-10298
Plaintiff:
BOCA VIEW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
ELEANOR LEPSELTER and EDWARD LEPSELTER
Leonardo Simpkins v. FNU Wissinger, et al
as 24-10237
Plaintiff:
LEONARDO SIMPKINS
Defendant:
FNU WISSINGER, Officer at Ocala Police Department - Individual and Official Capacity, FNU MCCATHERIAN, State Prosecutor - 5th Circuit Court - Individual and Official Capacity, EDWARD SCOTT, Judge- 5th Circuit Court - Individual and Official Capacity and others
Theodore Griffin v. Martin County, et al
as 24-10256
Plaintiff:
THEODORE KEITH GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MARTIN COUNTY, WILLIAM D. SNYDER, BRANDON GREIS and others
Robert FiedlerIn re: Robert Fiedler
as 24-10201
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT EDWARD FIEDLER
Respondent:
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P. and US BANK TRUST N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
In re: James Moss
as 24-10185
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EDWARD MOSS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Edward Oberwise
as 24-10109
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD OBERWISE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Edward Austin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10039
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD AUSTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
