Cases 21 - 30 of 243
Leon BrightIn re: Leon Bright
as 23-13749
Petitioner:
In re: LEON BRIGHT
Respondent:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
In Re: Chiquita Brands International, Inc., et al
as 23-13352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOES 1-205 OHIO ACTION (17-80547), DOES 1-205 FLORIDA ACTION (17-80323), JANE DOE 24 FLORIDA ACTION (20-82222) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. OLSON, ROBERT KISTINGER, WILLIAM TSACALIS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Moliere Dimanche, Jr.In re: Moliere Dimanche, Jr.
as 23-13013
Petitioner:
In re: MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Respondent:
TAKELA JACKSON, R. TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 23-12959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, I and others
Joshua Money v. Warden of Johnson State Prison, et al
as 23-12940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ISAIAH MONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF JOHNSON STATE PRISON, WARDEN OF GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION STATE PRISON, VILLEGAS and others
John Doe, et al v. Magical Cruise Company Limited
as 23-12816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED
John Doe, 1, et al v. USA
as 23-12822
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, I, JANE DOE, I, JOHN DOE, II and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Marcus Johnson v. C Jones, et al
as 23-12470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
C JONES, FNU PERKINS, D. LUKE and others
Julia Robinson v. FedEx Inc., et al
as 23-12488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA M. ROBINSON and JULIA MAE ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDEX INC., FEDEX, JOHN DOES and others
Maceo Williams v. Brian C. Wimes, Jr., et al
as 23-12437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACEO WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE BRIAN C. WIMES, JR., CIA, JOHN DOE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
